10.11440060651_si_001.pdf (23.49 MB)
Download fileJudy Field – Rejuvenation Through A Second Phase Of Drilling
journal contribution
posted on 2020-04-30, 14:19 authored by T. KELLER, R. BAYES, H. AULD, M. LINESThe Judy Field is a northwest plunging horst located on the northern part of the
Josephine Ridge in Block 30/7a, UK Central North Sea. The field is subdivided
by a series of north-northwest and northwest striking faults which form isolated
fault blocks. The 30/7a-11z well was the fifth appraisal well in Judy Field and is
located in a fault block to the north of the Judy Platform. The primary producing
reservoirs of this field are the Middle to Upper Triassic Joanne and Judy
Sandstone Members of the Skaggerak Formation with minor contribution from
the Upper Jurassic Fulmar Formation. Detailed analysis of the Triassic core
from the appraisal wells revealed 11 facies types which were grouped in four
main facies associations (channel sandstone and sheetflood sandstone as
reservoirs and argillaceous sandstone and lacustrine mudstone generally as
non-reservoirs). The present-day porosity and permeability of these facies is the result of the
relatively high primary porosity being slightly enhanced by diagenesis. The
main diagenetic enhancement mechanisms were carbonate and feldspar
dissolution by aggressive pore fluids. Predicting the reservoir performance from the Triassic section is difficult since
the core data indicates a highly permeable reservoir whereas the interpreted
depositional environment suggests a much lower interconnected permeability.
Initial drill stem tests from the appraisal wells indicated horizontal permeability
(Kh) values approximately one order of a magnitude lower than the core data.
Based on these data, a simplistic layered reservoir model was created to mimic
the relative variability in Kh seen in the core but with absolute values closer to
the DST derived Kh. This model was utilised to site seven production wells
which targeted the main interpreted fault blocks in the field. The long-term
production from these wells indicated that the 'effective permeability' of the
reservoir was another approximate order of magnitude lower than the DST Kh
data. The lower than anticipated permeability resulted in a more rapid decline
from plateau rate than anticipated but the anticipated reserves would be
produced over a longer period of time.